It is a well put together podcast, but it is certainly one sided. It had a major Pro Ramsey, anti police slant, but still a good listen.

I listened to the whole series and it is excellent. I’m with Lou Schmidt that it was an intruder. The fact that they got DNA from people on Lou’s suspect list that the Boulder PD didn’t do is just infuriating!! I’m still angry that Boulder PD is sitting on her DNA!! It’s criminal what they are doing. It’s been years since testing the DNA and they owe it JonBenet and her family to send her DNA to be tested but with the place where they found the Golden State killer!! Great work this team did and I praise them for doing work on this case since Colorado is so sketchy and won’t test the DNA!! The Governor should make Boulder PD get the DNA tested again, but the one they used to find the Golden State killer.

I learned a lot of new information. Thanks! My heart goes out to her family. This case feels so solvable.

When will those responsible admit their role? Never.

Completely misrepresents much of the case evidence to skew in favor of the Ramseys’ innocence. The Ramseys have put out A LOT of misinformation into the media. I hope the people who stumble on this podcast actually look into the evidence themselves. The Ramseys are just continuing to waste everyone’s time by attempting to misdirect the public, media, and investigators.

Podcast was disappointing and simply full of conjecture. Some evidence was presented but nothing new to me.

So skewed in favor of the Ramseys innocence. Allows “experts” to misrepresent information. If you’re learning about this case for the first time, DO NOT start here.

I had to turn this off after 2.5 episodes because not only is this podcast so devoid of facts, the skewed take just turned me off. This sounds less like an exploration of facts and more like the Ramsays media blitz. Disappointing to see the case presented in a way that does not explore any of the facts in a deeper manner.

This show really misses the mark in a few important ways, chief among them: it allows the “experts” to make assertions without any pushback or breakdown of the facts. For instance, at one point an expert says that the ransom note was conclusively proved to not have matched of the Ramsey’s handwriting, which is misleading at best. It’s completely one-sided, and no effort is made to explain any of the very concerning issues that caused people to look at the family.

The name “Jonbenet” is click bait. And these folks use it effectively. They present nothing new, they don’t advance the investigation at all, but they sell their ads. It’s just a rehash for bucks.